Scientific consultation and guidance. Evaluation criteria of the program work

Scientific consultation and guidance. Evaluation criteria of the program work

The systematic manager of this program tasks are appointed by the Department of Sociology, centering on the number of systematic passions of teachers and the quantity of scholastic training load.

The primary tasks of this manager

The task that is main of manager – advising and monitoring the entire process of utilization of pupil coursework.

The obligations for the manager include:

– support in seeking the subject associated with the program work plus the development of the work plan;

essay writers discount

– performing consultations that are systematic the pupil on dilemmas of work;

– support within the range of research practices;

– advising the student in the collection of types of literary works and factual product;

– monitoring the progress of work with conformity utilizing the founded plan and intermediate official certification of this pupil;

– work assessment.

Evaluation criteria associated with course work

The criteria that are main the evaluation of coursework include:

– the correctness associated with purpose that is stated goals of this work and their conformity using the content associated with work;

– liberty for the writer’s method of the disclosure associated with topic, such as the formula and reason of their very own method of resolving research dilemmas;

– persistence and presentation that is structured of product, like thequality of the conclusion and introduction, the connection and continuity between your components of the task, involving the theoretical and practical aspects of the research;

– the standard of the analysis plus the capability to make use of the ways of systematic research, like the quality of analysis obtainable in the literature methods to the study of this issues in mind;

– The practical need for the program work, like the connection of theoretical jobs considered within the work, with practice;

– the correctness of this utilization of sources, including conformity because of the guidelines for compiling a summary of sources;

– conformity aided by the coursework design demands, precision of design, the lack of spelling and grammatical mistakes in the written text (especially whenever making use of unique terminology);

– the contribution that is personal of author into the analysis and research of this issue.

Conformity using the guidelines of research ethics

When preparing a program work, unique attention is compensated to pupils’ conformity utilizing the guidelines of research ethics. In no situation should plagiarism, falsification of information and quoting that is”false be properly used.

We mean direct borrowing without appropriate as we mention plagiarism sources to any printed or electronic sources, previously defended final qualifying works, master’s and dissertations that are doctoral.

Once we state the falsification of information, we suggest up to a fake or replace the source information so that you can show the correctness regarding the summary (confirmation of this theory, etc.), along with the use that is deliberate of false information as a foundation for analysis.

False quote means the existence of links to your supply once the offered supply will not include such information or shows an invalid web page.

Detection of ethical breaches contributes to evaluation that is poor.

The finding among these violations of professional ethics may be the foundation for bringing down markings for program work, as much as grading “unsatisfactory”.

Course work is ranked for a scale that is five-point. The supervisor evaluates the work taking into consideration the quality for the text (for example. its content, logic and argumentation), the theoretical and level that is methodological of, in addition to completeness regarding the supply database. Along with the usage and knowledge of the literary works on the subject, the correctness associated with formula and solution associated with research issue, the legitimacy and credibility associated with the conclusions work, the design that is correct of work, along with the quality of message during the protection therefore the capacity to lead a discussion that is scientific.

Deja un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *